WILLIS v. DICIECO

No. 4-86-1090.

502 So.2d 101 (1987)

Joyce WILLIS and Pamela Tubbs, Appellants, v. Muriel DICIECO, et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

February 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Esther A. Zaretsky, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Lisa Miller Layman and James Patrick Garrity of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Sheehan, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the court on an appeal from a final judgment finding that some wild peafowl, either temporarily or permanently residing on appellants' land, constitute a nuisance. This finding is supported by ample competent evidence and should be, and is, affirmed.

The only other issue before the court is the method of capture and place of relocation of these peafowl. The final judgment under review does not make clear how this is to be accomplished...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases