PEOPLE v. LOAIZA


133 A.D.2d 469 (1987)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jaime Loaiza, Also Known as Jaime Looiza, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

September 28, 1987


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced at the trial was insufficient to corroborate the testimony of his accomplice pursuant to CPL 60.22. However, although the evidence independent of the accomplice's testimony might have had neutral explanations, it so harmonized with the accomplice's narrative as to have a tendency to furnish the necessary connection between this defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases