1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 162 Mich.
  5. 162 Mich. App. 438 (1987)
 

HICKS v. VAUGHT

Docket No. 88788.

162 Mich. App. 438 (1987)

413 N.W.2d 28

HICKS v. VAUGHT

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided February 4, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald R. Hershberger, for plaintiff.

Dickinson, Brandt, Hanlon, Becker & Lanctot (by Thomas R. Present), and Gromek, Bendure & Thomas (by Nancy L. Bosh), Attorneys of Counsel, for defendant.

Before: CYNAR, P.J., and J.H. GILLIS and D.F. WALSH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter plaintiff) sued defendant claiming serious impairment of a body function, MCL 500.3135(1); MSA 24.13135(1). The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary disposition. At the motion for summary disposition, plaintiff claimed that her complaint could be read as alleging an intentionally caused harm, MCL 500.3135(2)(a); MSA 14.13135(2)(a), thereby allowing her to recover in a tort action even though she had not met...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases