NLRB v. FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS

No. 86-594.

484 U.S. 112 (1987)

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL. v. UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 23, AFL-CIO

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 14, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norton J. Come argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Deputy Solicitor General Cohen, Andrew J. Pincus, Linda Sher, and Eric G. Moskowitz.

Laurence Gold argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were George Murphy, Peter Ford, David Silberman, and George Kaufmann.*


JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question to be decided in this case is whether a federal court has authority to review a decision of the National Labor Relations Board's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join. We hold that such a dismissal is not subject to judicial review under either the amended National Labor Relations Act or the Administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases