1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 408 N.W.2d
  5. 408 N.W.2d 182 (1987)
 

SIT v. T & M PROPERTIES

No. C7-87-147.

408 N.W.2d 182 (1987)

Eugene C. SIT, Appellant, v. T & M PROPERTIES, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 23, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Perlman, Nodland, Conn, Nordaune & Perlman, St. Louis Park, for appellant.

David A. Bailly, Daniel E. Fobbe, Cragg & Bailly, Ltd., St. Louis Park, for respondents.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and WOZNIAK and LESLIE, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying amended findings and a new trial and restating a prior conclusion appellant is not entitled to rescind a partnership investment. Appellant claims the trial court erred because (1) the parties did not intend appellant to become a partner in respondents' partnership and (2) appellant's investment was induced by fraud and misrepresentation. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases