DAVIS ENTERPRISES v. KARPF


105 N.J. 476 (1987)

523 A.2d 137

DAVIS ENTERPRISES, A PARTNERSHIP, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RICHARD KARPF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND JACK KARPF AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 31, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael N. Kouvatas argued the cause for appellant (Michael Kouvatas, attorney; Richard C. Borton, on the brief).

Gerald E. Haughey argued the cause for respondent (Brandt, Haughey, Penberthy, Lewis & Hyland, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, Justice.

This appeal presents the question whether a "hardship" variance sought pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c) must be denied because an adjoining property owner offers to purchase the property at fair market value. Defendant, Planning Board of the Township of Cherry Hill (the Board), determined that the offer did not compel the denial of the variance and that the offer was one factor, among others, to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases