1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 484 U.S.
  5. 484 U.S. 86 (1987)
 

LANGLEY v. FDIC

No. 86-489.

484 U.S. 86 (1987)

LANGLEY ET UX. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 1, 1987

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Shockey argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners.

Richard G. Taranto argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Deputy Solictor General Wallace, John C. Murphy, Jr., and Ann S. DuRoss.

JUSTICE SCALIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioners W. T. and Maryanne Grimes Langley seek reversal of a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) summary judgment on its claim for payment of a promissory note signed by petitioners. 792 F.2d 541 (1986). The Fifth Circuit rejected petitioners' contention that a defense of misrepresentation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases