Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court, in allowing the introduction of rebuttal testimony by Detective Sergeant Roman, properly exercised the discretion afforded by CPL 260.30 (7). The rebuttal testimony refuted an issue raised by testimony offered by the defense (see, People v Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.