STATE, EX REL. CELEBREZZE, v. ALLEN CTY BD. OF COMMRS.

Nos. 86-477, 86-676 and 86-911.

32 Ohio St. 3d 24 (1987)

THE STATE, EX REL. CELEBREZZE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ALLEN COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES. THE STATE, EX REL. CELEBREZZE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TUSCARAWAS COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES. THE STATE, EX REL. CELEBREZZE, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF AUGLAIZE COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 12, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Diane W. Weaver, for appellants.

David E. Bowers, prosecuting attorney, John M. Leahy and Brien W. Shanahan, for appellees in case No. 86-477.

Michael A. Cochran, for appellees in case No. 86-676.

Frederick D. Pepple, prosecuting attorney, and John F. Kuffner, for appellees in case No. 86-911.


Per Curiam.

The issue presented for our determination is whether writs of mandamus should issue compelling the Allen County Commissioners, the Tuscarawas County Commissioners, and the Auglaize County Commissioners (hereinafter "the appellees") to make additional appropriations for their respective public assistance funds. Whether the writs should issue in these cases depends on the meaning to be given to the word "balance," as it is used in R.C. 5101.161. For...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases