RIKSEM v. SEATTLE

No. 16188-1-I.

47 Wn. App. 506 (1987)

736 P.2d 275

ANTON RIKSEM, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

February 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan Eric Peterson, Peterson, Bracelin, Young, Putra & Fletcher, Inc., P.S., Paul Drachler, and Gibbs, Douglas, Theiler & Drachler, for appellant.

Douglas N. Jewett, City Attorney, and J. Roger Nowell, Assistant, for respondent.


SCHULTHEIS, J.*

Anton Riksem appeals from the dismissal of his complaint on summary judgment, assigning error to the trial court's finding that his suit against the City of Seattle is barred by RCW 4.24.210 (recreational use statute) and that the statute is not violative of the state and federal constitutions.

FACTS

On a sunny warm Monday, June 11, 1979, Anton Riksem, an experienced cyclist and sometime racer, cycled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases