1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 357 S.E.2d
  5. 357 S.E.2d 181 (1987)
 

BROWN v. ROWE CHEVROLET-BUICK, INC.

No. 8610SC1354.

357 S.E.2d 181 (1987)

86 N.C. App. 222

Robert L. BROWN and Linda A. Holt v. ROWE CHEVROLET-BUICK, INC. and James Rivenbark.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

June 16, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Underwood, Kinsey & Warren, P.A. by C. Ralph Kinsey, Jr., Charlotte, and Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan by Nigle B. Barrow, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Larry E. Norman, Louisburg, for defendant-appellant.

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant's sole argument on appeal is that the court erred in denying defendant's request at the beginning of the trial for a continuance. Rowe contends that it was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to retain the services of another attorney, having only been notified the afternoon before that its attorney was removed. We disagree.

N.C.Gen.Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 40(b) of the N.C.Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

(b) No continuance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases