HOSLEY v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP.

No. C3-86-1429.

401 N.W.2d 136 (1987)

Patrick HOSLEY, et al., Appellants, v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied April 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard LaVerdiere, Hastings, for appellants.

Patrick T. Tierney, Eugene D. Buckley, St. Paul, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and LANSING and NIERENGARTEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal comes to us following an initial appeal to this court and the Minnesota Supreme Court, and a remand to the trial court. Both parties appeal the trial court's determination that a finding of uncollectibility under the reallocation provision of Minnesota Statutes § 604.02, subd. 2 (1984) is premature as applied to a party to the transaction who was not a party to the lawsuit. We affirm.

FACTS

I. INITIAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases