1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 220 N.J.
  5. 220 N.J. Super. 294 (1987)
 

SOUTHLAND CORP. v. EDISON TP.

220 N.J. Super. 294 (1987)

531 A.2d 1361

THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND ROSEANNE AMENDOLA, T/A MENLO PARK AMOCO, AMOCO OIL COMPANY & AMOCO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL OF THE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON AND TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 31, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter A. DeSarno argued the cause for appellants.

Lee M. Hymerling argued the cause for respondent The Southland Corporation (Archer & Greiner, attorneys; Lee M. Hymerling, John P. Hauch, Jr. and Christopher R. Gibson, on the brief).

Vincent D. Paragano argued the cause for respondents Roseanne Amendola, Amoco Oil Company and Amoco Corporation (Vincent D. Paragano and Fran J. Garb, on the brief).

Before Judges GAULKIN, BAIME and ASHBEY.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Keefe's opinion reported at 217 N.J.Super. 158 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases