1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 355 S.E.2d
  5. 355 S.E.2d 158 (1987)
 

LAWTON v. DURHAM COUNTY

No. 8610IC1045.

355 S.E.2d 158 (1987)

John P. LAWTON, II, Employee/Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF DURHAM, Employer-Appellee (Self-Insured).

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 5, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Archie L. Smith, III, and William J. Riley, Durham, for plaintiff-appellant.

Durham County Atty. Russell Odom by Asst. Co. Atty. James W. Swindell, Durham, for defendant-appellee.

EAGLES, Judge.

By failing to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, plaintiff has subjected his appeal to dismissal. Provisions of Rules 9 and 10 require that exceptions be noted in the record immediately following the particular judicial action complained of, that those exceptions again be set out at the end of the record, and that they be made the subject of stated assignment(s) of error. Rule 28(b)(5) requires that the appropriate exceptions and assignments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases