STATE v. HOLMES

No. 86-888.

30 Ohio St. 3d 20 (1987)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HOLMES, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 8, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Allen, prosecuting attorney, and Jerry E. Ault, for appellant. J. Boyd Binning, for appellee.


Per Curiam.

The issue presented in this action is whether a new trial was properly granted to the appellee. For the reasons that follow, we answer in the affirmative and affirm the decision of the court of appeals.

The instant controversy centers around the trial testimony of Catherine Howell, a witness for the prosecution. Howell had been acquainted with the appellee for a long period of time. Appellant commenced its direct examination of Howell with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases