ROTH v. ROTH

No. C1-86-1560.

406 N.W.2d 77 (1987)

In re the Marriage of Francine Fay ROTH, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Lars Lyle ROTH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 26, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis M. Reidenberg and Michael Ormond, Reidenberg & Ormond, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Nicholas J. Zuber, Nicholas J. Zuber, Ltd., Duluth, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Francine Roth appeals the trial court's determination of spousal maintenance and child support, claiming the amounts are based on an unreasonably low estimation of Lars Roth's net annual income; she also claims the trial court abused its discretion by awarding insufficient attorney's fees and by failing to impose a goodwill value on a chiropractic business. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further findings.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases