SIMPSON ELEC CORP v. LEUCADIA


128 A.D.2d 339 (1987)

Simpson Electric Corporation, Respondent, v. Leucadia, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant, et al., Third-Party Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 18, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter, P. C. (Raymond Fitzgerald, Andrew W. Sidman and Deborah Doty of counsel), for appellant.

Barr & Faerber (Joseph J. Haspel of counsel), for respondent.

RUBIN and KUNZEMAN, JJ., concur with THOMPSON, J. P.; SPATT, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order insofar as appealed from, on the law, and deny the branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to dismiss the fifth counterclaim of the appellant, alleging a violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO; 18 USC § 1961 et seq.), with an opinion in which EIBER, J., concurs.


THOMPSON, J. P.

The issue with which we are confronted on this appeal is a question of first impression in this judicial department: whether State courts enjoy concurrent jurisdiction with Federal courts over civil claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (hereinafter RICO) (18 USC §§ 1961-1968). We find that the structure and language of that Act, viewed together with its...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases