Per Curiam.
Appellant questions the adoption of the referee's report by the court of appeals inasmuch as the report preceded the actual furnishing of the public record sought herein. Additionally, appellant points to a number of procedural defects at the referee's level. The questions raised are moot because appellant has been furnished with the public record he is seeking.
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the court of appeals granting summary...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
