Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants waived any contention that the plaintiff corporation lacked the capacity to sue on the contract (because it had entered into that contract after it had been dissolved for failure to pay its franchise taxes) by their failure to assert that defense in a motion before the service of their answer or in the answer itself (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [3]; [e]; see, Lorisa Capital Corp. v Gallo
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.