KALIMAR, INC. v. CAMERA KING


137 Misc.2d 317 (1987)

Kalimar, Inc., Petitioner, v. Camera King, Inc., Respondent.

Civil Court of the City of the New York, Kings County.

October 23, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin H. Segal, petitioner pro se. Mannarino, Bader & Bloom, P. C. (Arthur M. Neiss of counsel), for respondent.


ALAN L. LEBOWITZ, J.

The petitioner, an attorney-at-law, moves this court for an order quashing an information subpoena served upon him by the plaintiff's attorney.

The information sought to be quashed is a series of some 30 questions in relation to an indebtedness by the defendant to the plaintiff.

Petitioner contends that despite the fact that he did not represent the defendant in the instant proceedings, he did

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases