LEHTO v. SPROUL

(4660)

9 Conn. App. 441 (1987)

PAUL R. LEHTO v. ERIKA I. SPROUL

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released January 13, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. Paul Kaplan, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Richard J. Duda, for the appellee (defendant).

HULL, BORDEN and DALY, JS.


DALY, J.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether a litigant, after a final judgment on the merits of a contractual claim against the defendant, is barred by the principles of res judicata from thereafter pursuing a second cause of action, stemming from the same set of facts, against the same defendant. The present cause of action is in two counts, quantum meruit and implied contract. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant requested and was provided extra materials...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases