CARSTEDT v. GRINDELAND

No. C3-86-2001.

406 N.W.2d 39 (1987)

Howard B. CARSTEDT, Appellant, v. Gordon L. GRINDELAND, et al., Clean Print, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herman H. Bains, Williamson, Bains, Moore & Hansen, Minneapolis, for Carstedt.

Robert Lewis Barrows, Leonard, Street & Deinard, Mpls., for Grindeland, et al.

William E. Mullin, Mark P. Hodkinson, Bassford, Heckt, Lockhart & Mullin, Minneapolis, for Clean Print, Inc.

Heard, considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and PARKER and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment that respondents Steven Grindeland or Clean Print, Inc. (CPI) were not liable to appellant Howard Carstedt under an exclusive license agreement with respondents Gordon Grindeland and Clean Print Systems (CPS). We affirm.

FACTS

In June 1973, Carstedt executed a license agreement with Gordon Grindeland granting Grindeland the exclusive right to manufacture and sell a decurling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases