1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 415 N.W.2d
  5. 415 N.W.2d 28 (1987)
 

LINDQUIST v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.

No. C6-87-1015.

415 N.W.2d 28 (1987)

James C. LINDQUIST, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 10, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Klint, Randall J. Fuller, Babcock, Locher, Neilson & Mannella, Anoka, for appellant.

V. Owen Nelson, Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company denied appellant James Lindquist no-fault insurance benefits, claiming his policy was not in effect at the time of the accident. The matter came before the district court for a declaration of applicable law. The district court declared that Minnesota, not Tennessee, law applied. At trial Lindquist contended State Farm did not give him 60 days' notice of its intent not to renew...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases