BAILEY v. STATE

No. C0-86-1632.

409 N.W.2d 33 (1987)

Gary L. BAILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 14, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rodney E. Edwards, Edwards, Edwards & Bodin, Duluth, for appellant.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Beverly Conerton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, John P. Dimich, Itasca Co. Atty., Bernard L. Bodien, Asst. Co. Atty., Grand Rapids, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by PARKER, P.J., and SEDGWICK and LANSING, JJ.


OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal raises the issue of whether animal pelts obtained on reservation land, but possessed off reservation land, are subject to regulation under state law. We affirm appellant's conviction for violation of the state law.

FACTS

On July 30, 1986, a jury found Gary Bailey guilty of exceeding the pelt limit of fisher, a small furbearing animal, outside the Red Lake...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases