ARMSTRONG v. HECKMAN

No. C6-87-429.

409 N.W.2d 27 (1987)

Byron H. ARMSTRONG, Appellant, v. Joseph HECKMAN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. Bloom, Daniel B. O'Leary, Mansur, O'Leary & Gabriel, St. Paul, for appellant.

Thomas D. Jensen, Kay Nord Hunt, Lommen, Nelson, Cole & Stageberg, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and FORSBERG and MULLALLY, JJ.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment dismissing appellant's personal injury claim and an order denying a motion to vacate that dismissal. Appellant claims the trial court abused its discretion because (1) vacation of the dismissal is justified by excusable neglect, and (2) the initial order dismissing his action violated his constitutional rights of due process and equal protection. We reverse.

FACTS

In December...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases