Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
In view of the minimal evidence of the defendant's intoxication, the decision of his trial counsel to forego an intoxication defense appears to have been a reasonable trial tactic. Thus, contrary to the defendant's assertion, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Barrentine,
We have examined the defendant's remaining...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.