WALSH v. FIRST STATE BANK OF PENNOCK

Nos. C5-87-339, C6-87-379.

409 N.W.2d 5 (1987)

Patrick J. WALSH, et al., Appellants, v. FIRST STATE BANK OF PENNOCK, Respondent. Charles HEIMARK, Jr., Appellant, v. NORWEST BANK MONTEVIDEO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted September 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott B. Lundquist, Austin & Roth, Minneapolis, Michael D. Miller, Edina, for appellants.

Donald M. Spilseth, Anderson, Burgett & Spilseth, Willmar, for respondent First State Bank of Pennock.

David Minge, Nelson, Oyen, Torvik, Minge & Gilbertson, Montevideo, for respondent Norwest Bank Montevideo.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and PARKER and FORSBERG, JJ.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

These appeals are from trial court summary judgments holding respondent state-chartered, federally-insured banks did not charge usurious interest rates on appellants' agricultural loans. Appellants Walsh and Heimark claim the trial court erred because (1) Minn.Stat. § 334.011 exclusively determines the maximum interest rate permitted to be charged on agricultural class loans,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases