1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 107 N.J.
  5. 107 N.J. 295 (1987)
 

MATTER OF PAUK

107 N.J. 295 (1987)

526 A.2d 1021

IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE L. PAUK, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 19, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Engelhardt, Assistant Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

George L. Pauk argued the cause pro se.

On an order to show cause why respondent should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of five presentments filed by the District VIII Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee), which concluded in each matter that respondent was guilty of unethical conduct. The Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) agreed with the Ethics Committee's finding of unethical conduct. Upon review of the first two presentments, involving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases