OHIO BELL TEL. CO. v. ANTONELLI

No. 86-908.

29 Ohio St. 3d 9 (1987)

OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. ANTONELLI, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 4, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Linton, for appellee.

Kalpana Yalamanchili and Thomas G. Bedall, for appellant.


DOUGLAS, J.

The issue presented in this case is whether the proceeds of a workers' compensation award, having been paid to a claimant, are subject to attachment. We hold in the affirmative.

R.C. 2329.66, which establishes the statutory right to exempt property from attachment, provides in pertinent part:

"(A) Every person who is domiciled in this state may hold property exempt from execution, garnishment, attachment, or sale to satisfy a judgment or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases