STRICKLAND v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 8610IC1273.

359 S.E.2d 19 (1987)

Mary Alene STRICKLAND, Employee, Plaintiff v. BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Carrier, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 18, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lore & McClearen by R. Edwin McClearen, Raleigh, for employee-plaintiff.

Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan by C. Ernest Simons and Steven M. Sartorio, Raleigh, for defendants.


ORR, Judge.

I.

Defendants argue that plaintiff failed to prove that she sustained a compensable occupational lung disease, because there was no evidence that her respiratory problems were caused by her employment at Burlington Industries. We disagree.

To receive benefits for an occupational disease under the Workers' Compensation Act, N.C.G.S. Chapter 97, there must be a causal connection between the plaintiff's disease and her employment. Rutledge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases