PACIFIC FRUIT EXP. v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

No. CV 86-0259-PR.

153 Ariz. 210 (1987)

735 P.2d 820

PACIFIC FRUIT EXPRESS, Petitioner Employer, Pacific Fruit Express, Petitioner Carrier, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Isidoro B. Verdugo, Respondent Employee.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Supplemental Opinion May 7, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bonnet, Fairbourn & Friedman by William G. Fairbourn, Julie A. Doherty and Cynthia van R. Cheney, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Dennis P. Kavanaugh, Chief Counsel, the Industrial Com'n, Phoenix, for respondent.

Tretschok, McNamara & Clymer, P.A. by Brian I. Clymer, Tucson, for respondent employee.


CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

Isidoro B. Verdugo, claimant, seeks review of a court of appeals' decision setting aside an award issued by the Industrial Commission of Arizona (Commission) for his hearing loss suffered while an employee of Pacific Fruit Express. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. art. VI, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 23-948.

II. ISSUES PRESENTED

The issues presented on this review are 1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases