1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 159 Mich.
  5. 159 Mich. App. 199 (1987)
 

MOORE v. CITY OF DETROIT

Docket No. 76710.

159 Mich. App. 199 (1987)

406 N.W.2d 488

MOORE v. CITY OF DETROIT

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 9, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily C. Hall, and Richard A. Soble, for plaintiffs.

Donald Pailen, Corporation Counsel, Abigail Elias, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Joseph N. Baltimore, William L. Woodard and Harnetha Jarrett Williams, Assistant Corporation Counsel, and Downs & Zagaroli, P.C. (by Tom Downs and Roger F. Lane), of Counsel, for defendants.

Colista, Urso, Adams & Dettmer, P.C. (by F. Philip Colista and Constance J. Allen), for the Detroit City Council.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and M.J. KELLY and M. WARSHAWSKY, JJ.

ON REMAND

M.J. KELLY, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court for a decision on whether Detroit City Ordinance No. 556-H "unconstitutionally deprives property owners of their property interests without due process of law or just compensation." 424 Mich. 905; 384 N.W.2d 399 (1986). We had expressly declined to consider this issue in our earlier opinion for reasons stated therein. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases