WARE v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO.


220 N.J. Super. 135 (1987)

531 A.2d 757

CHARLES WARE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent J. Apruzzese argued the cause for appellant (Apruzzese, McDermott, Mastro & Murphy, attorneys; Vincent J. Apruzzese, on the brief).

Arnold Feldman argued the cause for respondent (Ballen, Keiser & Gertel, attorneys; Arnold Feldman, of counsel; Sheldon A. Weiss, Linda P. Torres and Arnold Feldman, on the brief).

Before Judges O'BRIEN, SKILLMAN and LANDAU.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SKILLMAN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant as the district manager of its Haddon Heights office. On February 2, 1983, he was discharged.

Plaintiff filed suit claiming that his discharge constituted (1) a breach of his employment contract and (2) a violation of public policy. The case was bifurcated and tried first on liability only.

The jury returned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases