CANTU v. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

Docket No. A028889.

189 Cal.App.3d 160 (1987)

234 Cal. Rptr. 365

RICHARD A. CANTU et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

February 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Robert L. Bordon, Robert R. Rickett, Richard L. Meiss and Donald Erickson for Defendant and Appellant.

Robert S. Sturges and Caputo, Liccardo, Rossi, Sturges & McNeil for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

LOW, P.J.

When a public utility does not exercise eminent domain powers to extend a line to serve customers, the right to sue in inverse condemnation does not exist if damage results from the extension. However, other legal remedies may be timely asserted if there are defects in the extension which proximately result in damage and were caused by the utility.

I

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases