SUN REFINING & MARKETING CO. v. BRENNAN

No. 86-1692.

31 Ohio St. 3d 306 (1987)

SUN REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. BRENNAN, CHIEF, DIV. OF BOILER INSPECTION, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 29, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley L. Arabis, Spengler, Nathanson, Heyman, McCarthy & Durfee, James R. Jeffery and Susan B. Nelson, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and Patrick A. Devine, for appellees.


LOCHER, J.

The issue presented for our determination herein is whether an agency whose order is being appealed under R.C. 119.12 must fully comply with the procedural requirements of R.C. 119.09 before the fifteen-day appeal period begins to run. For the reasons set forth below, we reply in the affirmative.

In relevant part, R.C. 119.12 provides as follows:

"Any party desiring to appeal shall file a notice of appeal with the agency setting forth the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases