HORSLEY v. LA CONTE


133 A.D.2d 186 (1987)

Wayne Horsley, Appellant, v. Anthony M. La Conte et al., Respondents-Respondents, and William J. Canary, Jr., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 19, 1987


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Assuming, arguendo, that the petitioner has standing to maintain this challenge to the sufficiency of the designating petition, we nevertheless conclude that the proceeding was subject to dismissal for lack of merit. As the petitioner concedes in his brief, the acceptance and consent executed by the substituted candidate contained the language that "I do hereby acknowledge that I have consented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases