STATE v. AMORE

(12975)

205 Conn. 104 (1987)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ENRICA AMORE

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released September 1, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. Reynolds, Jr., assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Joseph I. Lieberman, attorney general, for the appellant (state).

John L. Pottenger, Jr., with whom were Stephen Wizner and, on the brief, Miriam Berkman, Sally Zanger, Robert A. Solomon, Mary A. McCarthy and Craig Parrish, Elyn Saks and Stephen Behnke, legal interns, for the appellee (defendant).

HEALEY, SHEA, CALLAHAN, F. HENNESSY and SPADA, JS.


ARTHUR H. HEALEY, J.

In this action, which comes to us by way of reservation from the Superior Court, the parties seek advice on the following questions: (1) "Does Section 207 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 407, by virtue of the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, preclude the State of Connecticut from using legal process to require the defendant representative payee of social security benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases