OAMCO v. LINDLEY

No. 85-1114.

29 Ohio St. 3d 1 (1987)

OAMCO, APPELLANT, v. LINDLEY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 2, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Knepper, White, Arter & Hadden and R. Douglas Wrightsel, for appellant.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, and James C. Sauer, for appellee.

Murphey, Young & Smith and Joseph C. Winner, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Barber-Greene Co.

Knepper, White, Arter & Hadden and Michael P. Mahoney, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Flexible Pavements, Inc.


DOUGLAS, J.

On November 26, 1986, this court, on rehearing, decided the within cause. Appellee has now filed an additional motion for rehearing contending that the scope and effect of our ruling with regard to the prospective application of the decision is unclear and thereby presents the Tax Commissioner with difficulty in implementing our ruling uniformly and fairly.

Finding several of the points made by the commissioner to be welltaken, the court treats...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases