KATSOUFRIS v. ADAMO


216 N.J. Super. 84 (1987)

522 A.2d 1046

JOHN S. KATSOUFRIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND JOHN S. KATSOUFRIS AS ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR DROMAN SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. ROBERT ADAMO, GEORGE NATSIKOSTAS AND THEODORE KARAVIAS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. and ANK SHIPPING COMPANY, S.A., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 20, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bitner & Haft, attorneys for appellant John S. Katsoufris (Eric S. Kapnick, on the brief).

John J. Pribish, attorney for respondents Robert Adamo, George Natsikostas and Theodore Karavias (Adrienne C. Rogove, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, BAIME and ASHBEY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Adamo, Natsikostas and Karavias dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Katsoufris. Plaintiff argues that the affidavits and certifications submitted to the trial court raised genuine issues of material fact and therefore summary judgment was improvidently granted. We agree and are thus constrained to reverse.

We need not recount the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases