D.I.A.L. v. CITY OF CLIFTON CONST. APP. BD.


218 N.J. Super. 74 (1987)

526 A.2d 1125

D.I.A.L. (DISABLED, INFORMATION, AWARENESS & LIVING), A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORPORATION; AND KAREN KORB, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF CLIFTON CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS AND JO-CAL ASSOCIATES DEVELOPERS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 5, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Popiel argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (David J. Popiel of the Community Health Law Project, attorney, on the brief).

Thomas L. Weisenbeck argued the cause for defendants-respondents, Jo-Cal Associates (Hannoch Weisman, attorneys, Thomas L. Weisenbeck on the brief).

Respondent, City of Clifton Construction Board, through its attorney, Sam Monchak, elected to rely upon the brief and oral argument offered by Jo-Cal Associates.

Before Judges PETRELLA, GAYNOR and SCALERA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SCALERA, J.A.D.,

Plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to collectively as D.I.A.L.) appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint. They originally sought to reverse a decision entered by the City of Clifton Construction Board of Appeals (Board) which exempted the residential condominium project being constructed by Jo-Cal Associates (Jo-Cal) from compliance with legislation mandating design and construction considerations for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases