1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 31 Ohio
  5. 31 Ohio St. 3d 260 (1987)
 

SET PRODUCTS, INC. v. BAINBRIDGE TWP. BD. OF ZONING APPEALS

No. 86-1592.

31 Ohio St. 3d 260 (1987)

SET PRODUCTS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BAINBRIDGE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 15, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald A. Navatsyk, for appellees.

Craig S. Albert, prosecuting attorney, and Forrest W. Burt, for appellant.

HOLMES, J.

We are faced with two issues in this appeal: whether the doctrine of res judicata applies to the decisions of a township board of zoning appeals relating to variances, and if so, whether appellees demonstrated sufficient changed circumstances to avoid application of the doctrine in this case. We hold that res judicata is applicable to the grant or denial of a variance pursuant to R.C. 519.14(B), and operated to bar the April 1984 application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases