McKINNEY v. HARTZ & RESTLE REALTORS, INC.

No. 86-1213.

31 Ohio St. 3d 244 (1987)

MCKINNEY, A MINOR, ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HARTZ & RESTLE REALTORS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 15, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gustin & Lawrence Co., L.P.A., and R. Lanahan Goodman, for appellants.

Lindhorst & Dreidame Co., L.P.A., Thomas M. Tepe and Mark A. Mac-Donald, for appellee Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.

Dinsmore & Shohl, Gary D. Bullock and Julie Furber Bissinger, for appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation.


WRIGHT, J.

In considering the propriety of the trial court's grant of summary judgment to H&R and Conrail, we are mindful that Civ. R. 56(C) requires that "summary judgment shall not be rendered unless it appears from such evidence or stipulation and only therefrom, that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion and that conclusion is adverse to the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases