PIPER v. SCHER


221 N.J. Super. 54 (1987)

533 A.2d 974

BARBARA PIPER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. GERALD J. SCHER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 29, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Diane M. Lucianna argued the cause for appellant (Lucianna, Bierman and Stillman, attorneys, Diane M. Lucianna, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael B. Wallstein argued the cause for respondent (Gelman and McNish, attorneys, Jill L. McNish, of counsel, Michael B. Wallstein, on the brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, BRODY and SCALERA.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SCALERA, J.A.D.

The narrow issue presented here is whether, in a malicious prosecution action, defendant's voluntary termination or abandonment of the underlying criminal action, without any agreement with or other prejudicial misconduct by the plaintiff, may constitute a favorable termination of the criminal proceedings, one of the elements of such a cause of action. We determine the answer to that question affirmatively...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases