STATE v. SUGAR


108 N.J. 151 (1987)

527 A.2d 1377

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRY D. SUGAR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 28, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Paul Cronin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mark Paul Cronin and Boris Moczula, Deputy Attorneys General, of counsel and on the brief).

Jay H. Greenblatt argued the cause for respondent (Greenblatt & Riesenburger, attorneys; Jay H. Greenblatt and Mitchell H. Kizner, on the brief).


PER CURIAM.

This case has been before this court twice before. On this third appeal we hold that the trial court erred when it suppressed the evidence derived from a search of defendant's property, a search that resulted in the discovery of the victim's body.

I.

On July 10, 1979, Dr. Harry D. Sugar reported the disappearance of his wife, Joan Sugar. On July 31, 1979, Dr. Sugar signed a form consenting to a search of his house and ground by the Vineland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases