NEPHEW v. CITY OF AURORA

No. 83-2053.

830 F.2d 1547 (1987)

Jewell NEPHEW, Rafus Perkins, Elaine Neloms, and Charles Fulton, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The CITY OF AURORA, By and Through ITS MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; Stan Thomison and Kenneth L. Peterson, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

October 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marcia G. O'Brien (Patrick E. Kowaleski, Charles H. Richardson and Kathleen M. Schoen also, on the briefs), Aurora, Colo., for defendants-appellants.

Penfield W. Tate, II, Denver, Colo., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, and BARRETT, McKAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, ANDERSON, TACHA and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.


McKAY, Circuit Judge.

We consider, en banc, the issue of an appropriate measure of attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 when the sole recovery to the prevailing party in the underlying action is an award of nominal damages.

Plaintiffs, Jewell Nephew, Rafus Perkins, Elaine Neloms and Charles Fulton, filed suit against two Aurora police officers and the City of Aurora for infringing upon their constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. §§...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases