HERAEUS AMERSIL, INC. v. U.S.

Appeal No. 86-1526.

811 F.2d 1503 (1987)

HERAEUS AMERSIL, INC., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 26, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. King, Fitch, King & Caffentzis, New York City, for appellant.

Barbara M. Epstein, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, for appellee. With her on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, New York City.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


RICH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the question whether the Court of International Trade correctly held that Heraeus Amersil's (Heraeus) imported "bell jars" were properly classified by Customs under item 548.05 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as "Articles not specially provided for, of glass: Other" or should be classified, as urged by Heraeus below and on appeal, under item 548.01 TSUS as "Tubes and tubing with ends processed: Containing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases