SMITH v. BOROUGH OF BARNEGAT LIGHT


219 N.J. Super. 11 (1987)

529 A.2d 1000

ETHAN ALLEN SMITH, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE BOROUGH OF BARNEGAT LIGHT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 10, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry J. Dasti, argued the cause for appellants (Dasti & Murphy, attorneys; Jerry J. Dasti on the brief).

Frank A. Buczynski, Jr., argued the cause for respondents (Shackleton, Hazeltine and Buczynski, attorneys; Frank A. Buczynski on the letter brief).

Before Judges KING, DEIGHAN and HAVEY.


PER CURIAM.

This matter comes before us by way of appellants' motion for a stay pending appeal. By separate order we have denied that motion. We have accelerated the appeal for purposes of argument and disposition because it involves an election matter. See R. 1:2-5(1).

On our own motion we summarily affirm the judgment below substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Serpentelli in his written...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases