1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 811 F.2d
  5. 811 F.2d 1470 (1987)
 

HYDRO-DYNAMICS, INC. v. GEORGE PUTNAM & CO., INC.

Appeal No. 86-1184.

811 F.2d 1470 (1987)

HYDRO-DYNAMICS, INC., Appellant, v. GEORGE PUTNAM & COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 11, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Laughlin, Benoite, Smith & Laughlin, of Arlington, Va., argued for appellant.

James B. Middleton, of Decatur, Ga., argued for appellee.

Before SMITH, Circuit Judge, BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge, and NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Hydro-Dynamics, Inc. appeals the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, sustaining an opposition filed by George Putnam & Company, Inc., thereby denying to Hydro-Dynamics federal registration of the mark WATERCOLORS for waterbed linens. George Putnam & Co. v. Hydro-Dynamics, Inc., 228 USPQ 951 (TTAB 1986). We affirm the Board's decision.

Background...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases