LIDDELL v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MO.

Nos. 86-1511, 86-1565, 87-1275, 87-1301 and 87-1355.

822 F.2d 1446 (1987)

Craton LIDDELL, et al. v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellant, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI; Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri, in his official capacity; The State of Missouri Board of Education; John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri; William Webster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri; Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri; Stephen C. Bradford, Commissioner of Administration of the State of Missouri; the State of Missouri Board of Education and its members. Erwin A. Williamson (President), Jimmy Robertson (Vice-President), Grover A. Gamm, Delmar A. Cobble, Dale M. Thompson, Donald W. Shelton and Robert Welling, Appellees, United States, Appellee. (Two Cases) Craton LIDDELL, et al. v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, Appellee, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI; Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri, in his official capacity; The State of Missouri Board of Education; John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri; William Webster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri; Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri; Stephen C. Bradford, Commissioner of Administration of the State of Missouri; the State of Missouri Board of Education and its members. Erwin A. Williamson (President), Jimmy Robertson (Vice-President), Grover A. Gamm, Delmar A. Cobble, Dale M. Thompson, Donald W. Shelton and Robert Welling, Appellants. Craton LIDDELL, et al. v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MISSOURI, Appellant, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI; Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri, in his official capacity; The State of Missouri Board of Education; John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri; William Webster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri; Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri; Stephen C. Bradford, Commissioner of Administration of the State of Missouri; the State of Missouri Board of Education and its members, Erwin A. Williamson (President), Jimmy Robertson (Vice-President), Grover A. Gamm, Delmar A. Cobble, Dale M. Thompson, Donald W. Shelton and Robert Welling, Appellees, United States, Appellee. Craton LIDDELL, et al. v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, et al. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, STATE OF MISSOURI, and Special School District of St. Louis County, Missouri, Appellees, v. The STATE OF MISSOURI; Arthur Mallory, Commissioner of Education of the State of Missouri, in his official capacity; The State of Missouri Board of Education; John Ashcroft, Governor of the State of Missouri; William Webster, Attorney General of the State of Missouri; Wendell Bailey, Treasurer of the State of Missouri; Stephen C. Bradford, Commissioner of Administration of the State of Missouri; the State of Missouri Board of Education and its members, Erwin A. Williamson (President), Jimmy Robertson (Vice-President), Grover A. Gamm, Delmar A. Cobble, Dale M. Thompson, Donald W. Shelton and Robert Welling, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided June 8, 1987.

As Modified June 9, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth C. Brostron, St. Louis, Mo., for the Bd. of Educ. of the City of St. Louis.

Jordan Cherrick, St. Louis, Mo. (argued), for the Special School Dist.

Robert Presson, Atty. Gen.'s office, Jefferson City, Mo., for the State of Mo.

Frank D. Allen, Jr., Washington, D.C., for appellee the U.S.

William Russell, St. Louis, Mo., for Liddell parties.

Before HEANEY, McMILLIAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges.


HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

At issue in this appeal is the fate of a recent district court plan for the further integration of the vocational schools of the St. Louis metropolitan area.1 The district court decided that South Tech and West Tech should be closed and that all vocational classes should be taught at North Tech in the county or O'Fallon in the city. It assigned programs to each school, revised racial goals, established the conditions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases