U.S. v. VILLANO

No. 85-2535.

816 F.2d 1448 (1987)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul C. "Paulie" VILLANO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 21, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur M. Schwartz (Michael W. Gross, with him on the briefs), Denver, Colo., for defendant-appellant.

Richard Marien, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Kansas City, Kan. (Robert N. Miller, U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., and A. Mary Sterling, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Kansas City, Kan., on the briefs) for plaintiff-appellee.

Before HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge, BARRETT, McKAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR, ANDERSON, TACHA and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.


ON REHEARING EN BANC

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant, Paul C. Villano, filed a motion in federal district court to correct a clerical mistake in the order of judgment and commitment. He asserts that the sentence spoken by the trial judge is different from what appears on the judgment and commitment order, and because the two conflict, the oral sentence should control. The district court denied his motion, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases